Comparison Between MongoDB and Redis

When it comes to cloud-native programming or managing large amounts of diverse data, NoSQL databases are typically the preferred choice by developers.

Choosing the right NoSQL database from the many available options can be a challenging task. After extensive research, it becomes apparent that there are several suitable alternatives to consider. Among these options, MongoDB and Redis are widely recognized as the most appropriate choices for various use cases.

Although databases may appear to be similar, this is not entirely true. If the wrong database is chosen at the beginning of a software development project, valuable time may be squandered attempting to rectify the issue. As a result, it is critical to select the appropriate database from the start.

It is crucial to comprehend the differences between MongoDB and Redis – two NoSQL databases that share many similarities. To identify their contrasts and determine the optimal solution for your requirements, comparing these two options is essential.

Choosing Between Redis and MongoDB: When and How to Use Each Option

When comparing MongoDB versus Redis, there are four significant factors to keep in mind:

  • Speed
  • Key Features of a System
  • Scalability
  • Storage

Next, we will examine and differentiate these two NoSQL databases by performing a comparison.

SpeedUnlike Redis, it relies on on-disk storage by default, making it slower.Redis is more efficient than MongoDB since it stores data in RAM rather than on disc.
Tech RequirementsDecreased RAM needs but increased HDD space.Needs more memory but less hard drive space.
ScalabilityThrough ranging, hashed, and zoned sharding, distributed architecture enables scaling across several nodes and geographic areas.Redis Cluster enables hashed sharding, which allows Redis users to grow.
StorageA binary form of JSON (BSON) that can be stored on disc and which uses a versatile document data format.A paradigm of in-memory key-value storage in which the data is seen as a whole.

Although it may seem daunting to select between MongoDB and Redis, it is actually simpler than one may think. Each NoSQL database can provide benefits to both you and your application, but two essential criteria must be considered when making a choice.

Complexity of Queries

MongoDB is the optimal selection for use cases that necessitate complex queries. This is due to Redis’ query capabilities being constrained intentionally, allowing for faster query execution times via its primary key access architecture. Conversely, MongoDB is slower but provides a greater variety of query alternatives.

If software development involves complex queries, MongoDB is the preferred option due to its reputation for offering a more streamlined development experience. Conversely, if fast query returns are the top priority, Redis is the recommended choice – albeit with the caveat that increased upfront effort is required.


In terms of user-friendliness, MongoDB outperforms Redis. MongoDB has a lower learning curve than other databases, making it easier to configure. However, Redis is more flexible. MongoDB is the preferred option for those seeking to establish a NoSQL database with minimal effort. In contrast, Redis is the optimal choice for those requiring a fast database with greater customization options even if it requires additional investment of time.

Comparing Redis and MongoDB: A Feature Comparison

To make it even simpler, we will produce a graphic that illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of each database.

Simplicity of usageSpeed
CostInvaluable as a hiding place
Ability to scale with a variety of sharding options Excellent for use as a session organiser.
The structure of documents may be altered as needed.Terrific as a conduit for communication
Compatible with Windows, Mac OS X, and LinuxCompatibility with Linux and macOS installation is possible. You need to utilise WSL on Windows.
To no cost whatsoeverThe ability to utilise it is provided at no cost.

Selecting the Appropriate One for My Task

MongoDB can be advantageous in situations that don’t demand high speed. It’s an excellent choice for prototyping, startups, and hackathons. Additionally, MongoDB is ideal for data models and structures requiring regular changes, as it streamlines data without necessitating a pre-defined schema.

If your software development lifecycle allows for adequate planning and consideration of database architecture, Redis provides an excellent caching solution. However, MongoDB is the superior option if time is of the essence. If you have the ability to invest a substantial amount of time in the planning and development stages, Redis is the optimal choice. Additionally, Redis should be the top choice if speed is the primary concern, as its performance is unrivaled.

Join the Top 1% of Remote Developers and Designers

Works connects the top 1% of remote developers and designers with the leading brands and startups around the world. We focus on sophisticated, challenging tier-one projects which require highly skilled talent and problem solvers.
seasoned project manager reviewing remote software engineer's progress on software development project, hired from Works blog.join_marketplace.your_wayexperienced remote UI / UX designer working remotely at home while working on UI / UX & product design projects on Works blog.join_marketplace.freelance_jobs