Dealing with Divorce
Dividing Responsibilities (DSoC) is an overarching principle that serves as the basis for various architectures and software design practices, commonly called ‘clean architecture’. The idea is to decompose a program into several distinct components, each addressing a particular problem. By doing so, we can ensure that the program’s code stays orderly and easy to manage.
It is vital to have a clear and precise definition for each system component, reflecting its distinct business function. Additionally, each component should have particular demands and resources for itself. An efficient architecture is one that is free of any reliance on third-party frameworks or libraries, allowing for more flexibility in the development process.
Moreover, it is advisable to structure the system in an orderly way, with distinct separation between layers that manage user interfaces, business logic, and data stores or sources. This allows for independent modification and testing of each layer, ensuring greater agility and efficiency in the development process.
Realizing success in Clean Architecture can be compared to attaining the ‘holy grail’ – a goal that is challenging to achieve practically, especially when systems are continuously evolving. Instead of emphasizing the finer points of Clean Architecture, I find it more intriguing to examine the software development teams themselves.
Engineering teams can be arranged in different ways, based on function, technology, business sector, or a combination of these factors, depending on the specific product, feature, or module. By forming engineering teams that cater to the various system elements, clean architecture can be adopted.
Regarding strategic outsourcing, this is an excellent match.
Systems-on-Chip (SoCs) and clean architectures are designed to facilitate seamless collaboration with external software developers. This is because, when outsourcing is preferred, the primary trade-off is often the ability to rapidly enhance technical capabilities while minimizing risks.
Following clean design principles eliminates the possibility of external dependencies becoming a sole point of failure. To further mitigate this risk, outsourcing software development is a feasible option. For instance, components or individual programs within a system can be outsourced, as outlined in this article.
- Upgrading application-specific logic or switching to an alternative framework (or both).
- Creating a new product or component that complies with company regulations while having specific operational parameters of its own.
- Enhancing the user experience of a product or service by upgrading its user interfaces.
- Creating new data sources to enhance business intelligence and strategic planning, as outlined in this article.
Embracing Clean Architecture creates a strong case for outsourcing engineering operations. As an illustration, a monolithic application can be segmented into independent domains, each with its own set of services and microservices for context-related functionalities. This helps in recognizing areas where independent teams can contribute without undermining the overall platform’s stability.
A dedicated delivery team, consisting of a relatively small number of members, is much more likely to provide significant value than a large team of individual contributors in delivering functional software at any level of the architecture. This underscores the strategic significance of leveraging outsourced development services, as discussed in this article.
Outsourcing a team of developers is advisable, as clean architecture provides the flexibility of dividing the program into distinct components that can be independently worked on. This allows the team to execute multiple tasks across different departments concurrently, without affecting the primary objective, as elaborated in this article.