Separation of Concerns (SoC) is a unifying concept that underpins many different architectures and software design patterns, commonly referred to as ‘clean architecture’. This approach involves breaking down a programme into various components, each of which deals with a specific issue. By following this approach, it is possible to ensure that the programme’s code remains organised and manageable.
It is essential that each component of a system should be clearly and accurately defined in order to reflect a unique business purpose. Furthermore, each component should have its own specific set of requirements and resources. An effective architecture is one that doesn’t depend on any third-party frameworks or libraries, which can provide more flexibility during the development process.
In addition, it is recommended that the system should be structured in an organised manner, with clear separation between the layers that handle user interfaces, business logic, and data stores or sources. This will enable individual layers to be modified and tested independently, allowing for greater flexibility and efficiency in the development process.
Achieving success in Clean Architecture can be likened to reaching the ‘holy grail’ – an aspiration that is almost impossible to achieve in a practical way, particularly when systems are in a continuous state of change. Instead of focusing on the more detailed elements of Clean Architecture, I believe it would be more interesting to look at the software development teams themselves.
Engineering teams can be organised in a variety of ways, such as by function, technology, business sector, or a combination of these elements, depending on the specific product, feature, or module. By creating engineering teams that take into account the various elements of the system, it is possible to adopt a clean architecture approach.
As it relates to strategic outsourcing, this is a wonderful fit.
Systems-on-Chip (SoCs) and clean architectures have been created with the intention of allowing external software developers to collaborate with ease. This is due to the fact that when outsourcing is the preferred option, the main trade-off is often the ability to rapidly increase technical capabilities, while minimising risks.
Adhering to the principles of clean design eliminates the risk of external dependencies acting as a single point of failure. To reduce this risk further, software development outsourcing is a viable option. Examples of this would be outsourcing individual programmes or components of a system.
- Updating application-specific logic or migrating to a different framework (or both).
- The development of a new product or component that adheres to company regulations but has its own set of operational parameters.
- Improving the usability of a product or goods by updating its user interfaces.
- The development of fresh data sources to boost BI and strategic planning.
The adoption of Clean Architecture is a compelling reason to consider outsourcing engineering operations. An example of this is a monolithic application that needs to be divided into distinct domains, with each domain having its own set of services and microservices to provide context-sensitive features. This can help to identify areas where autonomous teams can make a contribution without jeopardising the stability of the overall platform.
It is significantly more likely that a dedicated delivery team, consisting of a comparatively small number of members, would offer greater value than a large team of individual contributors when it comes to providing functioning software at any level of the architecture. This emphasises the strategic value of utilising outsourced development services.
It is recommended to employ an external team of developers due to the advantages of clean architecture, which allows for the programme to be divided into distinct components that can be worked on independently of each other. This approach enables the team to carry out multiple tasks across different departments simultaneously, without compromising the overarching goal.