What It Really Costs Your Business When You Make a Poor Hiring Decision

If you are a seasoned team leader, you have likely encountered the question of the costs associated with a bad hire. Can you make a rough calculation of the expenses incurred?

Studies show that nearly half, at 46%, of newly hired employees fail to make it past the 18-month mark. It is essential to accept this reality and implement remedial measures instead of feeling remorseful.

What characterizes an ineffective employee?

One unfit team member can lead to a surplus of responsibilities for everyone involved. A popular Spanish TV series, ‘La Casa de Papel‘, demonstrates this well. The protagonist, referred to as The Professor, was in charge of a group of criminals and had meticulously planned for a possible police intervention. He had also provided detailed guidelines and instructions for the bank heist, and dedicated months to preparing his team. But, did the heist go smoothly as planned? Unfortunately, not.

Rio and Tokyo, two indispensable members of the team, demonstrated outstanding skills in their designated areas of expertise; Rio was an exceptional hacker, while Tokyo proved to be a proficient bodyguard. However, their personal entanglement created complications for the rest of the group. Nevertheless, the team triumphed in their mission to carry out a bank heist and escaped to a paradise island unscathed.

Next time Rio and Tokyo break the rules, consequentially forcing the team to cooperate and execute another bank heist, the question will arise again about the reasoning behind hiring them. Although an engaging plot can’t be created without a certain level of tension, their expertise can make it possible. However, one should contemplate whether to hire someone who might pose a liability and whose character is not fully known to the organization. It is probable that productivity rather than excitement is preferable within any company.

The Effects on Your Team When You Hire Ineffectively

It is crucial to ensure that the person you employ is a suitable match for your current team. Cohesiveness among team members is vital for business development, regardless of their skill level, but this is particularly significant for distributed companies. What are the implications of hiring someone who does not align with the company’s culture?

Decline in Effectiveness and Collaboration

Inappropriate employment choices can significantly harm a company because a worker who is incompatible with the organizational culture is unlikely to contribute to the fulfillment of its objectives. Over time, staff may become disheartened with poor output, inability to meet deadlines, and changing customer demands.

Customer Loss

Frequent delays in project delivery by your team can prompt customers to seek alternatives and turn to competitors.


In today’s fiercely competitive business arena, preserving a positive reputation is crucial. Over a period of time, you have exerted considerable effort to build your company’s image. Therefore, it is imperative to make certain that customers are dealt with by the appropriate individual. Mishandling clients can negatively impact your business and the quality of service they receive.

Time Devoted to Supervision

An erroneous recruitment decision can result in ramifications beyond solely causing project delays. When managers are accountable for an employee, devoting more time to that individual can limit the availability of time and energy for other assignments.

New Staff Payroll Costs

Employing and educating workers can be expensive and time-intensive. Many of the available tools to support the job hunt necessitate an investment. Furthermore, the recruitment process involves considerable effort from personnel, such as crafting job postings and assessing resumes. The new recruit’s instruction is the final stage in the process. It is critical to keep in mind that, even with a streamlined onboarding program, training still necessitates substantial time and energy from both the employer and staff. Hence, it is vital to ensure that the correct individual is hired to avoid squandering time, effort, and resources.

Recruiting the wrong person can negatively influence team morale; hence, it’s important to evaluate how a potential hire will integrate into the team’s environment. To prevent this, we adopt the ‘No Asshole’ rule. Inappropriate hiring decisions can result in enduring consequences for your personnel, so take this into account when assessing the advantages and disadvantages of retaining a possibly detrimental hire in order to maintain team unity.

The Actual Cost of a Poor Recruitment Decision

Until now, we have highlighted the human resources that are compromised due to a poor hiring decision. Should we endeavour to quantify the monetary cost of these expenses?

According to SHRM, it typically takes 42 days and carries an average expense of $4,129 to fill one position. The United States Department of Labor declared that a poorly made recruitment can cost up to 30% of the employee’s salary in their first year. Moreover, Gallup approximated that poor hires cost US firms approximately $450-550 billion per annum in decreased productivity.

A recent survey of CFOs revealed that 34% had encountered a substantial decline in productivity and workforce scheduling as a result of poor recruitment decisions. Additionally, managers were found to devote 17% of their work week addressing unproductive staff. This represents an unacceptable depletion of productive time for any organisation.

Studies disclosed that 74% of companies that made poor hiring decisions witnessed a financial loss of an average of £14,900 in earnings.

These costs will have a disproportionate effect on small businesses. Disregarding these statistics and concluding that their consequences for your enterprise will be insignificant is unwise. This is improbable.

Preventing Inappropriate Hiring Decisions

Making an erroneous recruitment decision is a possibility for anyone. It is essential to acknowledge when an unfit candidate has been hired and take action to correct the situation.

Indications of a Poor Recruitment

  • Careless Attitude towards Quality Control
  • Repetitive Mistakes even after being corrected.
  • Falsifying their competencies on their CV that they cannot apply in reality.
  • Constant Faultfinding and an Unwillingness to Take Responsibility for their Actions.
  • Annoying to Work with as they are Habitually Late and Underperforming.
  • Regularly causing Workplace Troubles and Strained Relationships with Colleagues.
  • Above all else, customer grievances.

Dealing with a Misjudged Recruitment

There seems to be no simple solution to this problem. To tackle the shortcomings, it could be helpful to arrange multiple assessment sessions to review the concerns. Alternatively, it might be worthwhile to provide the subpar employee with another chance by transferring them to a different department where their abilities could be more effectively utilized.

It is better to take action sooner rather than later if a particular strategy is not effective. As a team leader, it is not helpful to defer making tough choices in the expectation that an employee will suddenly have a revelation and transform into the model team player. Your team’s perception of you may be impacted if you delay making a decision. In the end, being straightforward and letting go of a subpar employee may be the optimal choice.

Enhance Your Recruitment Techniques

Enhancing the hiring process is the most efficient method to minimize the chance of employing inappropriate candidates. Detecting unfit applicants at an early stage will help prevent any possible problems from emerging.

At Works, we have designed a streamlined technique for virtual recruitment that factors in a candidate’s soft skills and attitude. This guarantees the selection of the appropriate individual for the position, as someone who is not committed to the recruitment process is unlikely to be devoted to the role.

It is apparent that recognizing and recruiting the finest candidates can be challenging. To guarantee the success of the hiring process, it is vital to learn from prior errors and consider the opinions of your team. If additional support is needed, please feel free to reach out to us.

Join the Top 1% of Remote Developers and Designers

Works connects the top 1% of remote developers and designers with the leading brands and startups around the world. We focus on sophisticated, challenging tier-one projects which require highly skilled talent and problem solvers.
seasoned project manager reviewing remote software engineer's progress on software development project, hired from Works blog.join_marketplace.your_wayexperienced remote UI / UX designer working remotely at home while working on UI / UX & product design projects on Works blog.join_marketplace.freelance_jobs