Which Is Better, Angular or jQuery?


To ensure your project thrives, a solid structure is of utmost importance. When striving to generate top-notch websites, jQuery and Angular are both fantastic options. However, selecting the most appropriate framework for your specific needs can prove to be a challenging feat.

In the current business landscape, a website and web application are indispensable for engaging with customers and clients. To ensure these tools operate smoothly, they must boast easy-to-navigate interfaces and other modern components. When looking to build superior client-based features and expand the scope of your app, it is crucial to select the appropriate front-end framework. This blog entry will compare and contrast jQuery and Angular to assist you in making an informed decision while selecting a framework.

In Simple Terms, What Exactly Is jQuery?

This leads us to the initial point of our conversation regarding jQuery vs. Angular.

jQuery is an open-source JavaScript library that is compact in size yet provides an extensive spectrum of advantageous features. It simplifies the process of building front-end web applications, facilitating the creation of websites and the incorporation of diverse features. Established in 2006 under the MIT License, the library is designed to optimize code and boost the responsiveness, interactivity, and dynamic capabilities of JavaScript. Currently, over 78% of websites rely on its functionality, and it is compatible with multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Opera, and more.

In comparison to standard JavaScript, jQuery boasts a significantly wider range of features. Simple DOM manipulation, event handling, AJAX requests, and animations can all be easily executed using jQuery. In contrast, making AJAX requests with standard JavaScript would necessitate cumbersome code. jQuery streamlines this process by employing methods that can be called with minimal code. Moreover, it simplifies the task by abstracting the process.

The opening segment concerning this matter has been wrapped up. Let us now move on to the second point of disagreement between jQuery and Angular.

In Layman’s Terms, What Exactly Is Angular?

AngularJS is an open-source, structural framework based on TypeScript, which is extensively used for front-end development and maintained by Google. This framework offers a multitude of advantages when developing dynamic, one-page web apps, including asynchronous processing, directives, dependency injection, and unit testing. Furthermore, due to its scalability, speed, and user-friendly data binding, it has become the preferred framework for key players in various industries such as PayPal, Google, and Forbes.

In order to ensure the components we build can be reused, Angular employs HTML as a template language and extends HTML attributes with additional directives. As it takes advantage of HTML and JavaScript, there is no need to learn a new language or syntax. It’s important to note that Angular is a TypeScript-based rewrite of AngularJS, which itself is written in TypeScript (a superset of JavaScript).

Before we begin our comparison and contrast of jQuery and Angular, let’s first discuss their similarities and differences.

Characteristics of jQuery and Angular


JQuery is a potent yet easy-to-use library that can be implemented on multiple platforms. It is lightweight, flexible, and designed to be modular, allowing users to complete a wide range of tasks on applications. These include document navigation, creating animations, adding events and elements, and selecting DOM elements, among others.

Some of the most noteworthy features of jQuery include-

  • It enables full browser portability.
  • By reusing previously introduced elements, methods, or events as plugins, you can save time and avoid starting from scratch each time.
  • It allows for straightforward manipulation of HTML and DOM documents.
  • It has multiple ways to modify CSS.
  • Thanks to its event-handling capabilities, it can
  • >It is extremely lightweight.
  • As a result, you can create Ajax and JSONP applications.

Thanks to a highly active open-source community, jQuery regularly receives new and useful plugins for the framework.


Angular leverages dependency injection, declarative templates, and integration with its component-based framework to make programming less complex. It also allows for two-way binding of data between the user interface fields and model data, preventing programs from becoming excessively complicated.

Angular is known for the following key features:

  • It is built upon the foundation of Dependency Injection.
  • It allows for two-way data binding.
  • It supports the MVC framework.
  • It utilises the RESTful API.
  • Real-time updates are provided whenever the UI field or model data are modified, which enhances an application’s responsiveness and user experience.
  • >

    By utilising single-page-application (SPA) technology, websites can be visually appealing and loaded faster.

In Angular, there is no need for manually constructing instances or changing dependencies. When declaring a function, only the required parameters need to be specified.

Key Differences Between jQuery and Angular

Comparing and Contrasting Two Popular Frameworks: jQuery and Angular

On the contrary, jQuery is a JavaScript library that provides tools for manipulating the DOM.

Angular is a front-end framework designed to assist developers in creating and deploying sophisticated web applications.

jQuery vs. Angular: Which One Is Superior?

As a library, jQuery utilises fewer resources than Angular.

By incorporating various useful features out-of-the-box, Angular can save significant time for developers, eliminating the requirement to download and configure additional plugins for each function.

jQuery vs Angular: A Comparison of Time-to-Deployment

Numerous individuals contemplate if Angular is faster than jQuery. The answer is yes, indeed.

In contrast to jQuery, which is only triggered when modifications are made, the efficiency of Angular applications may be hampered as their complexity increases, since it must be processed for every keystroke. However, Angular’s caching feature, which stores data from previous requests, limits processing to only changes made since the last time the data was cached. This significantly boosts loading speed and creates a much smoother user experience.

Although Angular usually has a marginally slower response time than jQuery, this difference is insignificant and unlikely to be discerned by most users.

Dimensions of jQuery versus Angular

When downloaded, a complete copy of jQuery has a size of about 1 MB.

In contrast, if you utilized the official boilerplate for Angular, the resulting file would be roughly 30MB in size!

Depending on the user’s internet speed, integrating Angular into a website may take longer than anticipated. Nevertheless, the framework’s developers have asserted that there is no need to be concerned about performance or optimisation, as it functions effortlessly and quickly.

jQuery versus Angular: Learning Curves in Competition

Studies indicate that the learning curves for Angular and jQuery are largely comparable regarding the length of time it takes for a beginner to become acquainted with them. Nonetheless, Angular offers more intricate functionality, which may prove challenging to comprehend for developers with limited experience.

To decide which framework best fits your project, the only method is to try out each one.

jQuery Versus Angular: Components Compared

Supported by the jQuery JavaScript library, jQuery provides a series of thoughtfully chosen UI components, such as animations, themes, and widgets.

The user interface of an Angular application is created by a hierarchical structure of components. Each component in the template is derived from a template and can only be instantiated once.

Data Binding: A Comparison Between jQuery and Angular

The two-way data-binding functionality of AngularJS is one of the primary reasons it has gained much popularity. This feature guarantees the coherence of data across layers and makes code management and maintenance a breeze. Any changes made in the View layer are immediately manifested in the Model layer.

On the other hand, jQuery’s data flow is one-directional, with all data originating from the Model layer. Although user interactions can still be accommodated, the UI elements are more straightforward to address.

Each method may be successful, but while one emphasises efficiency, the other places greater importance on reliability and productivity.

Combining jQuery with Angular

Angular is a prevalent JavaScript framework that streamlines the development and administration of single-page applications and websites.

When you require access to the Document Object Model (DOM) with HTML, CSS, or JavaScript for your front-end development, jQuery offers a collective DOM API, that can be utilized. It is compatible with several web browsers.

Responsiveness Compared: jQuery vs Angular

Due to the rapid nature of JavaScript, jQuery can effortlessly manage minor changes to the DOM without necessitating a complete re-render.

Angular depends on HTML declarative formats which must be fully re-rendered when new data is brought in; for this reason, even slight adjustments can be time-consuming. Consequently, Angular operates at a slower pace than jQuery.

Debugging Angular with jQuery

It is crucial to remember that debugging in one framework may be effortless, while in another framework it may be considerably more challenging or even unattainable. This knowledge is valuable to developers who are deciding on which framework to use, whether they prioritize swiftness or the ability to handle complicated tasks with simplicity.

In general, whether or not JQuery or Angular is easier to debug is contingent on the project and the front-end developer working on it, but typically jQuery is significantly less complex to debug than Angular.

Comparison jQuery Angular
Description Front-end Library Front-end Framework
Based on JavaScript Language TypeScript, a subset of JavaScript
Data Binding Unidirectional. From Model Layer to DOM Supports Bidirectional flow of data between Model Layer and DOM
size Lightweight Library Heavy. Equipped with built-in functionalities
Learning Curve It is simple and easy to learn It is comparatively harder due to its complexities
Usage DOM Manipulation, Cross Platform Web App Development Creating Single-Page Applications, User Interface
Compatible For Suitable for small size projects Suitable for large, complex projects

jQuery vs Angular: Which One is Superior and Why?

Now that we’ve discussed the principal contrasts, the query arises: which is better, jQuery or Angular?

If you require a tool akin to jQuery, you need not search any further.

Uncomplicated tool for handling the DOM

  • >

    Adding new features to an existing website or online application.
  • Integrating animation and other graphic, user-interactive elements into your website
  • Quick website page loading, event handling, and Ajax communications
  • Infinite customization choices and flexibility
  • Utilizing “plain” JavaScript in Your Work

If you conclude that Angular is what you require, feel free to use it.

  • A formidable framework that encompasses all the features you may desire
  • Comprehensive error examination and unit testing. The Angular framework is a stable alternative for building web applications that can be effortlessly tested.
  • Applications with striking graphics and intuitive user interfaces
  • Rapid development pace
  • A well-organized, reusable codebase
  • Single-page, web-based forms

JQuery can be utilized to augment the capabilities of Angular, e.g., providing form validation. Integrating JQuery into an AngularJS web project can result in enhanced efficiency and effectiveness.

The drawbacks of Angular compared to jQuery include-


The learning curve is quite steep. It necessitates basic knowledge to comprehend.


Complicated applications are not ideal for this purpose due to the possibility of performance issues. They might require additional libraries and plugins to support them, potentially resulting in slower speeds.


When selecting which technology to employ for software development – either jQuery or Angular – it is crucial to assess the framework’s potential to allow user interaction, reduce the amount of necessary code, and streamline the integration of multiple features.

Angular is a framework, while jQuery is a library. jQuery is an excellent resource for front-end development (UI design). On the other hand, Angular has the ability to manage all aspects of front-end development, with specific emphasis on single-page applications.

It is evident that neither Angular nor jQuery can be deemed the clear winner in this debate. The optimal technology for a given task is contingent on the specific requirements of the project. In general, jQuery is better suited for smaller websites, while Angular excels in developing high-performance web applications like single-page apps. For this reason, it is vital to evaluate the development requirements of the project to determine which technology is most appropriate.

If you are having trouble getting started with programming or selecting a specific framework, please do not hesitate to reach out to us for guidance. The Works team is dedicated to aiding in the success of your project. Furthermore, you may want to consider employing programmers to assist you in constructing a flexible and scalable program. For additional information, please visit our website.

Join the Top 1% of Remote Developers and Designers

Works connects the top 1% of remote developers and designers with the leading brands and startups around the world. We focus on sophisticated, challenging tier-one projects which require highly skilled talent and problem solvers.
seasoned project manager reviewing remote software engineer's progress on software development project, hired from Works blog.join_marketplace.your_wayexperienced remote UI / UX designer working remotely at home while working on UI / UX & product design projects on Works blog.join_marketplace.freelance_jobs